segunda-feira, 22 de dezembro de 2014

NIETZSCHE, FÉRÉ E O TIPO PSICOLÓGICO DE JESUS EM O ANTICRISTO


Une leçon clinique à la Salpêtrière (1887), por André Brouillet (1857-1914). Charles Féré, assistente e secretário de Charcot, é o segundo médico na platéia (da direita para a esquerda).

Nietzsche, Féré e o tipo psicológico de Jesus em O Anticristo
Nietzsche, Féré and the psychological type of Jesus in The Antichrist

Allan Davy Santos Sena
Doutorando em Filosofia pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), bolsista
CNPq, Campinas, SP - Brasil, e-mail: allandavy@hotmail.com



Resumo

Em sua investigação sobre o tipo psicológico de Jesus em O Anticristo, Nietzsche irá recorrer muito mais a termos e conceitos psiquiátricos comuns à literatura médica do final do século XIX do que a dados historiográficos, exegéticos ou arqueológicos. É no estudo do fenômeno da hiperexcitabilidade e seu estado hereditariamente progressivo como sintoma característico da degenerescência fisiológica, encontrado por Nietzsche na obra do médico francês Charles Féré, que o filósofo buscará estabelecer o fundamento fisiológico para as suas considerações sobre o tipo psicológico de Jesus, classificado como idiota. 

Palavras-chave : Fisiologia. Degenerescência. Hiperexcitabilidade. Idiotia.

Abstract

In the investigation on the psychological type of Jesus in The Antichrist, Nietzsche will resort much more to terms and concepts common to the psychiatric literature of the late nineteenth century rather than data historiographical, archaeological or exegetical. It is in the study of the phenomenon of hyperexcitability and in its progressive hereditary condition, characteristic symptom of physiological degeneration, that Nietzsche found in the work of French physician Charles Féré, that the philosopher will seek to establish the physiological fundamentation for his considerations about the psychological type of Jesus, classified as idiot.

Keywords : Physiology. Degeneration. Hyperexcitability. Idiocy.

sexta-feira, 3 de outubro de 2014

NIETZSCHE AND THE BEATITUDE OF JESUS AS WILL TO POWER

The Lake of Galilee looking south from Tiberias, 1902, by John Fulleylove.

Nietzsche and the beatitude of Jesus as will to power

Allan Sena[1]

Nietzsche ends the section 30 of The Antichrist with the following statement, which reinforces the thesis that the evangel of Jesus is the result of a morbid hyperexcitability [2] and a will to pleasure proper of weakness: “– The fear of pain, even of infinitely minute pain – that can end in no other way than in a religion of love...” [3] To understand this sentence, it is necessary to turn to the posthumous fragment 14 [130] of spring of 1888, in which Nietzsche did a sketch of an attempt of a demonstration of this argument. The fragment is titled “Reaction: religion. Moral as décadence.” In its beginning, Nietzsche writes down: Reaction of the little people [kleiner Leute]”; and, in the other line: “Love gives the highest feeling of power”. [4] In the posthumous fragment 10 [86] of the fall of 1887, Nietzsche clearly establishes the connection between Jesus and the little people, whom he and Paul would have filled the head with delusions of grandeur. The little people are the type meek, withdrawn, private, idiot, the kind of people, as the philosopher explains in the fragment 10 [92] from the same period, that was composed the small Jewish family of the Diaspora, from the lake, from Galilee, the same environment where Jesus was born. What this décadent people managed to find as source of power? Love. In the continuation of his notes, in the fragment 14 [130] of spring of 1888, Nietzsche warns: “Understand to what extent is not the man in generally that is speaking here, but a certain type of man. One should scrutinize this type a little more closely.” That is, this expedient that represents the foundation of the moral of this little people, is not reserved to any type of man, is not addressed, in any way, to the middle man, much less to the resentful type of décadent man, to the Christian type. This do not refer, it must be emphasized, to the type of love which blossomed as the crown of the Jew hatred against Rome that Nietzsche speaks in section 8 of the first essay of Genealogy of Morals, neither the third of the three Christian virtues, or rather, shrewdnesses (Klugheiten): faith, hope and love, analyzed in section 23 of The Antichrist. This love of which the philosopher is referring at this moment is most likely the love that born from a deep fear of pain, the unconditional love of Jesus. [5]
What causes the pain in the degenerate? The excitations, the stimuli, the external sensations, the reality. [6] Every obstacle is a stimulus, it requires resistance, it requires response, but the degenerate person is unable to give such an answer; this obstacle then exhausts the reserve of energy of the degenerate, resulting in an unpleasant feeling of loss of power, thus causing pain. [7] In other words, the aggressor, everything that harms (all reality, therefore) incites, in the assaulted, a resistance, a response, a defense, which the degenerate is incapable to offer. The degenerate finds itself thus with only two choices: to resent or to love. The resentment produces an internal conflict (which in some nature may even prove to be a source of power), causing therefore pain again. However, a person with an extreme hyperexcitability, with a morbid irritability that reached its climax, cannot endure even that kind of pain. How could be possible, then, for such a person, avoid any pain, the pain most infinitesimal? Avoiding any conflict, whether external or internal. How to avoid, in turn, any and all kind of conflict? Eliminating the feelings of hostility, the aggressive instincts, the resentment; no longer resisting, no longer responding (to avoid any waste of force), whether in act or in the heart, either externally or internally. How can this be done? By acceptance, by love of what harms, of what causes pain and suffering, even the acceptance of pain and suffering itself, something like what Nietzsche called Russian fatalism [8]: “‘we are divine in love, we become children of God, God loves us and requires nothing of us except love’”. [9] But behold then what happens: the love produces pleasant feelings, love brings peace to the soul, beatifies, love makes the pain cease. What, in reality, does that mean? Love produces a sense of power. As Nietzsche notes:

ie: all morals, all obedience and action does not produce a feeling of power and freedom like that one that the love produces
– for love no evil is done, it is done much more than what would in obedience and virtue
– here, the gregarious happiness, the feeling of solidarity in the big and small things, the living sentiment of unity is experienced as the summa of the feeling of living.
– to help, to care, to serve, this stimulates constantly the feeling of power, the apparent success, the expression of joy emphasizes the feeling of power
– the pride is not absent, as community, as dwelling place of God, as “chosen” [10]

Nevertheless, this love, this power so elevated that this person of such degenerate physiological constitution cannot recognize as yours, which seems to take over your being from the inside, but at the same time, presents itself as another, as a superior power, as “Father”, could not come – this person believes – from himself, this love can only come from his Father who is in Heaven, from his beloved Abba (Daddy); this love is the manifestation of the power, the glory, the kingdom of God. By love, he becomes a son of God. His kingdom of God is this feeling of profound communion with all things, with God, of love of all things, of God:

And, in fact, the man once again suffered an alteration of personality: this time, his feeling of love he called God
one should imagine the awakening of such a feeling, a kind of ecstasy, a foreign speech [eine fremde Rede], an “evangel”
it is this tidings [Neuheit] that does not allows him to attribute the love to himself: – he thinks God has drawn his way, and became alive in him – [11]
                                                
When Nietzsche speaks about other alteration of personality [12], he is probably referring to the alteration of personality of the saint. [13] This alteration is a consequence of folie circulaire[14], which is in the base of Christian mechanisms of penance and redemption, in which it seeks to intensify the alternation between states of depression and excitement proper to degeneracy, further aggravating a physiological conditioning weakened in the pursuit of a fleeting sensation of a power boost, which the saint believes not belong to him. Therefore, the Christian doctrine and the redemption offered by Jesus rest upon the same physiological reality, ie, the hyperexcitability, however, each one presents a particular way of dealing with this condition, namely: an unnatural and harmful manner and a natural and not harmful manner.
In a person like Jesus, this love, or rather, this feeling of power is manifested, or even better, is conditioned by the existence of the other, of the aggressor itself, of the neighbor, of the “enemy”, of the “bad man”, of the reality itself; the neighbor, the love of neighbor, then becomes his God, for it is through it that one attains the peace of soul, the beatitude, the feeling of power: that one lives in the kingdom of God. As clarifies Nietzsche: “‘the ‘neighbor’ [in Jesus] is transfigured into a God (because the feeling of love is revealed in his presence)”. [15] At another moment: “Jesus is [becomes] the neighbor, since he was rethought as a deity, as exciting cause of a feeling of power.” [16]



[1] Doctoral student in Philosophy at Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. Scholar of CNPq (allandavy@hotmail.com).
[2] Hyperexcitability is a concept found by Nietzsche in the work of the French physician Charles Féré. Cf. Féré, Charles. Sensation et mouvement: études expérimentales de psycho-mécanique. Paris: Félix Alcan, 1887. Féré, Charles. Dégénérescence et criminalité: Essai physiologique. (BN) Paris: Félix Alcan, 1888.
[3] Cf. Nietzsche, Friedrich. “The Antichrist”. In: The portable Nietzsche. Selected and translated, with an introduction, prefaces and notes by Walter Kaufman. Nova York: Vinking Penguin, 1982, p. 602.
[4] Cf. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Kritische Studienausgabe. Herausgegeben von Giorgio Colli und Mazino Montinari. Berlin/München/New York: Walter de Gruyter/DTV, Band 13, 1988.
[5] The fact of this love, or even the fact of evangel did not be a complete exclusiveness of Jesus, but indeed a common reality to a kind of little people who lived in Palestine at that time, was already regarded as a historical fact since Ernest Renan, likewise, since quite a time, historians have been calling attention to the existence of several predecessors of Jesus, this is actually an important argument for those who oppose the historical existence of Jesus.
[6] “Who alone has good reason to lie his way out of reality? He who suffers from it. But to suffer from reality is to be a piece of reality that has come to grief” (The Antichrist § 15).
[7] This is a discussion found in the work of Féré.
[8] Cf. Ecce Homo, Why I am so wise § 6.
[9] FP 14 [130] spring of 1888. Cf. 1 Epistle of John 3:1.
[10] FP 14 [130] spring of 1888.
[11] Idem.
[12] Nietzsche found this concept in the work of Alexandre Herzen. Cf. Herzen, Alexandre. Le cerveau et l'activité cérébrale au point de vue psycho-physiologique. Paris: Libraire J.-b. Baillière et Fils, 1887, “Troisième partie”, “Conscience et personnalité”, pp. 197-310.
[13] Cf. FP’s 14 [124-125] spring of 1888.
[14] The concept of folie circulaire was also worked by Féré.
[15] FP 14 [130] spring of 1888.
[16] Idem.